Home » News & Views » Commentary
RSS XML

Flame War


A lot of dirt has been thrown in the ongoing dispute between Jefferson Parish and firefighters in the East Bank Consolidated Fire Department, and it has served only to muddy the main issue: paying firefighters. Other areas of contention are drug testing, disclosure of prescription medications and sick leave policies — but firefighters are most concerned with how much they are paid. For their part, parish officials should focus on keeping the fire district's Class 1 fire protection rating, which is the highest in the state.

  The dispute escalated after Oct. 3, when the Jefferson Fire Fighters Association (JFFA) voted to censure parish Homeland Security Director Deano Bonano and interim East Bank Fire Director Dave Saunders. The union also issued a vote of "no confidence" against the two men. JFFA leader Bob Burkett, a former Jefferson firefighter, says the vote was taken because of many disagreements firefighters have had with Bonano and Saunders over safety, equipment and salaries. Three weeks after the vote, according to Burkett, Saunders proposed making changes to firefighters' work schedules, annual pay increases and overtime. Jefferson Parish special counsel Mickey Landry says the proposed changes to the parish "red book," which contains regulations for the firefighters, would result in a 20 percent decrease in annual income for the average firefighter. Burkett says the changes would cut firefighters' pay 25 percent. Whichever number is correct, the move smells of payback.

  The Jefferson Parish Council is scheduled to vote on the amendments this Wednesday (Jan. 14). We think the council should think twice before cutting firefighters' pay and jeopardizing Metairie's fire safety rating.

  The parish and firefighters negotiated the current pay plan just two years ago — the first new pay plan in 17 years. The new pay plan gave firefighters a 35 percent pay increase — to make up for the 17-year gap and to put them on par with similarly situated firefighters in other jurisdictions. The plan also included scheduled overtime and yearly raises. Scheduled overtime is based on a 56.5-hour average workweek, which has been a fire department standard for decades. The firefighters' work schedule was reviewed by a parish consultant in 1993 and determined to be cost-effective.

  Now, parish officials say they must revise the plan — or raise property taxes on homes and businesses in the fire district. The proposal would reduce firefighters' yearly raises from 5 percent to 2 percent and change their work schedules to reduce scheduled overtime significantly.

  Firefighters' pay is the crux of the matter, and it is what parish officials and the firefighters' union should be discussing in earnest. Instead, both sides have lawyered up, and the parish has hired a PR firm, the Ehrhardt Group, to get out its message to voters. Part of the parish's message is that the current pay plan and work schedule costs taxpayers too much money, and the proposed changes would save roughly $2.8 million a year. Firefighters dispute those numbers and ask: What about the money parish officials are spending on lawyers and a public relations campaign? Wouldn't that money be better spent solving the problem? The Gambit last week filed a public records request for the exact amount spent on PR and attorneys in this matter, and the amount reported was more than $173,000.

  As for the other proposed "red book" amendments — drug testing and sick leave — Burkett admits the rules could stand some updating. He adds that firefighters have never had a problem with drug testing, and he agrees that firefighters should report any medications they may be taking to the parish's medical review officer, a qualified physician. (Firefighters should not have to share personal medical information with anyone other than a physician.) The parish has also claimed firefighters who receive full pay when recovering from injuries will sometimes work other jobs that require as much physical exertion as their firefighting duties. The parish wants the rules modified so firefighters who are able will have modified duties while recovering from injuries. The union has agreed to this. Problems solved.

  It will take more compromises to solve the pay discrepancy, and a resolution demands that both sides put out the rhetorical fires. The goal should be protecting homes and businesses while maintaining Metairie's Class 1 fire rating.



Share this article:

Del.icio.us  digg  facebook  Google Bookmarks  MySpace  Newsvine  reddit  Technorati  Yahoo My Web  ?

COMMENTS
4 comments posted for this article
ConcernedJeffResident
 1/13/2009 - 8:10am
   Shame on every member of the Parish Council, and Mr. Broussard's administration, including the over-paid and uneducated asbestos attorney, Mr. Landry. Mr. Landry needs to return to his "self proclaimed" asbestos litigation and leave the firemen alone. How on earth can he lay his head down at nighttime knowing he is making false attacks at these life saving hero's? The actions on behalf of the Parish are PURE RETALIATION, they can deny it all they want, they know the truth. This fight began 3 weeks AFTER the Firemen had a vote of "no confidence" against Mr. Bonano, Director of Homeland Security and over the Fire Department, as well as interim Fire Supt Dave Saunders. Mr. Bonano possesses no qualifications to be in this position and does not possess any level of fire/life saving skills as compared to these hero's of our Parish. And Mr. Saunders qualifications? He has none. While in the Fire Department, he never made it past the position of Lieutenant. Mr. Saunders was never even put in a position to run one single Fire Station, and now he is over an entire department? Mr. Saunders has done everything to direct his employee's to do illegal and immoral things to not paying time owed to Firemen, and this is the man the Broussard administration trusts? This fight began over safety issues. Safety issues that the Firemen continued to bring forward to Mr. Broussard's administration that were blatantly and repeatedly denied. These safety issues range from not having the air packs (talk about life safety equipment) tested all the way to communication equipment. Doesn't anyone remember 9/11? Doesn't anyone remember how many Firemen died in 9/11 because of faulty safety equipment? I ask everyone, how many of you, after 25 plus years of performing life saving jobs would stand quiet, on the side, and let their beloved fire department ruined by incompentent administration? As far as the drug testing "squabble" goes, shame on every member of the Parish Administration who is trying to mis-lead the public stating the Firemen are fighting being drug tested. thse firemen have been drug tested since the early 90's. These firemen are asking that when they disclose a medication they take be directed to a Doctor, one that can make an educated guess as to how/if it will impair the fireman, as well as ensure the confidentiality of these firemen? Mr. Broussard, and Parish Council members, do the right thing. Leave these men alone. Leave their families alone Stop exploiting the true hero's of this parish. Stop wasting tax-payers dollars on this mud-slinging campaign to ruin their reputation. Haven't you already ruined their lives enough by posting their Social Security numbers "by accident" on the World Wide Web, and then didn't give them any identitity theft protection? When each of you're judgement day is upon you, may each of you be judged by how you chose to turn the truth around and waste tax payers dollars by saying false things about our hero's.
   Signed,
   A truly concerned, life-long, college educated professional tax paying member of Jefferson Parish
Report this comment
TASK FORCE 1
 1/13/2009 - 10:03am
   Thanks to everyone who support your firefighters. It is very comforting to know our public has our backs when we need them.
Report this comment
talkitout12
 1/13/2009 - 11:29am
   I hope the council does the right thing for the firefighters and their families. Thank you, firefighters, for the work you do. I will keep you in my prayers.
Report this comment
gildareed
 1/13/2009 - 4:21pm
   It is unconscionable that our elected public officials are hiding behind their well-paid lawyer and public relations firm. Our firefighters have legitimate and grievous complaints against Bonano and Saunders. Their radio communication is laughable. Their onboard computers are inoperable. Their lifesaving air-packs are unserviced. 24 firefighters who did not return after Katrina have never been replaced jeopardizing the whole community. Instead, unscheduled overtime has been doled out like candy resulting in skewed salary totals. Before Katrina, rarely was unscheduled overtime needed or given. Because of the manpower shortage and piss-poor management since Katrina, this has changed. And the double whammy is that this overtime payment is being used against the very guys who are pulling more than their weight to keep a Class 1 rating. They did not ask for this and would prefer to have the 24 long overdue positions filled (not counting the personnel positions needed to man the new station).
   
   I hesitate to call the things I have heard come out of Landry's mouth "misleading". In my book, they are deliberate lies meant to deceive the public for the benefit of a paying client called the Jefferson Parish Council. Summary ordinance 22648 must be defeated. Are you listening, Councilmen?
Report this comment

Post a comment



My Profile | My Settings

advertisements

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2009, Gambit   RSS