 Mark Johnson of Brotherhood Incorporated says his group has taken out loans to keep its AIDS housing open. |
Belle Reve is a Bywater facility that has provided housing and other
services for people with HIV/AIDS for 16 years. Assisting HIV/AIDS
patients is an expensive proposition because care has to be available
24 hours a day, and the agency depends on a number of income streams,
including foundation grants and federal monies. So it's big trouble for
Belle Reve when one of its funding sources is notoriously slow in
making payments to the facility, and often is behind eight months or
more in reimbursing the agency for services.
That source? The city of New Orleans.
Vicki Weeks, Belle Reve's executive director, says the
city's payment process has been problematic for years. In September,
the city paid some but not all of Reve's invoices for January-March
2009, but the Office of Community Development (OCD), which oversees the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Housing
Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA), used 2008 carryover funds
to make the payments. Weeks says OCD promised to pay out the carryover
funds much earlier and she still has yet to receive anything from the
2009 funds.
"Not a penny," Weeks reports, "and they owe us
$267,000."
Not many businesses would agree to provide services
without a signed contract and then not receive any reimbursement for
work performed until nearly eight months later, but that's exactly what
the City of New Orleans expects from local agencies that supply housing
for people with HIV/AIDS. The city wants these organizations to provide
services beginning every year on Jan. 1, but it doesn't send out
contracts until at least August and sometimes later. It's not a
sustainable business plan, and it forces some of these agencies to
secure bank loans while waiting for a city contract and
reimbursement.
Weeks says it has been particularly hard on smaller
agencies that don't have the cash reserves and fundraising mechanisms
of the larger organizations like Belle Reve. Mark Johnson operates one
of the city's smaller HOPWA providers, Brotherhood Incorporated in the
Tremé, and last year the financial strain — accumulating
bank debt and no incoming funds — became too much for
Brotherhood.
"We had to shut down until we got the signed agreement,"
Johnson says.
In April 2008, Johnson says his board told him there
wasn't enough cash flow to keep the six-bed facility open while
awaiting a contract from the city. The signed contract arrived in
November, six months later, while Brotherhood's doors remained closed
to needy clients. Since then, Johnson has been able to reopen the
facility, but his organization currently owes a bank $160,000.
"I can't keep constantly floating the HOPWA program to
the tune of $150,000 to $200,000 every year," Johnson says, adding that
Brotherhood has now had to put up its property as collateral on the
loan.
Patricia Campbell, regional public affairs officer for
HUD, says the federal agency is "concerned," and has taken action. "In
June of this year, we did do a monitoring review, which outlined a
number of issues and problem areas," Campbell says.
Congress awarded HOPWA funds fairly late this year
— July 31. The city's share of these funds is formulaic, however,
so each year it can expect approximately the same amount from the
federal government: $3 million. Could the city pay local agencies while
it is waiting for its federal grant? With the New Orleans metropolitan
area currently having the second highest growth rate in the country for
AIDS cases, now might be a good time to find out.
According to the OCD, the city is funding seven agencies with 529
clients through the HOPWA formula funding, which is based on an area's
AIDS statistics. Some clients are given rental, mortgage and/or utility
assistance while others are housed in agency-owned facilities and
provided around-the-clock supportive care. In an email interview,
Anthony Faciane, OCD's deputy director who is in charge of the HOPWA
program, stated that federal funds are paid out on a cost-reimbursement
process, adding, "Sub-recipients are supposed to have operating capital
to carry them until money is available and payments can be
processed."
Faciane affirms that the city did commit $435,000 in
leftover 2008 HOPWA funds to pay agencies while waiting on the 2009
HOPWA allowance. However, his office still had to conduct "procedural
and regulatory steps," which included advertising funding availability,
evaluating and ranking applications, selecting agencies, negotiating
and executing contracts, processing invoices and, finally, disbursing
funds.
The application process began Jan. 5, but the first
check wasn't sent out until Aug. 21. One of the steps was routing six
contracts, which were signed by agencies in late May, from OCD's
offices in the Amoco building, 1340 Poydras Ave. — across the
street from City Hall. That short journey took more than a month, and
the contracts arrived in the city attorney's office July 7.
Eric Oleson is the director of Project Lazarus, which
has two facilities for HIV/AIDS clients and houses a total of about 70
people each year. He says he was told the HOPWA carryover funds were
supposed to keep cash flowing for agencies until 2009 funding came
through. His organization had only a month's worth of payroll reserves
when it received the leftover monies in September.
"The whole system they had set up didn't work," Oleson
says. "It was still very delayed."
HUD's Campbell says that this lack of synchronization
and disconnect between offices was one of the main problems noted in
the June monitoring report. Based on the report, HUD is now providing
technical assistance to the New Orleans program.
"One of our recommendations is they needed to coordinate
better to make sure they're complying with getting the funding out in a
timely fashion," Campbell says.
Faciane doesn't mention the technical assistance in his
response and defends the city's funding procedure, saying it is "based
on a traditional HUD grant administration process." He also notes HUD
hasn't cited the city for any findings or concerns regarding its HOPWA
program.
In 2008, local HIV/AIDS agencies made similar complaints
about the Mayor's Office of Public Health and AIDS Funding and its long
delays in allocating money from another federal source, the Ryan White
Part A HIV/AIDS program ("What's In Their Wallets?" Gambit, Aug.
19, 2008). In October of that year, the City Council's Housing and
Human Needs committee held a hearing on the matter as well as a
subsequent meeting, and Noel Twilbeck, executive director for NO/AIDS
Task Force, which receives both Ryan White and HOPWA monies, says Ryan
White funding has dramatically improved, but HOPWA remains a
problem.
"It feels like a stone wall that doesn't go anywhere,"
says Twilbeck.
Could the New Orleans City Council get involved with HOPWA funding
and demand faster results? Councilmember Stacy Head thinks so, and she
says it wouldn't be a difficult fix given that under the HOPWA formula,
the city receives a similar amount every year for HIV/AIDS housing.
"We could set up a revolver (fund), so that we pay these
agencies in March, and we get reimbursed in August (when HUD sends the
city its funding)," Head says.
Head adds the revolver fund could be supplied by
Neighborhood Improvement Funds (NIF) or leftover HOPWA monies. As for
the applying pressure to force OCD to more efficiently distribute
reimbursement to local agencies, Head says it would depend on the
council withholding funds, something she says it hasn't been willing to
do.
Holding back funding could be counterproductive because
of whom it would affect most: agencies in most desperate need of a
faster system. One improvement over last year's process has already
occurred: The city's HOPWA deadline was Oct. 30, more than two months
ahead of the 2009 cutoff date.
Johnson of Brotherhood says this type of preplanning is
critical because funding delays could produce deadly results. "Without
housing, medicine and proper care," he says, "people will die."
Share this article:
?