Home » News & Views » Commentary
RSS XML

2A: The Only Option

New Orleanians should not have to take ownership of an inferior federal product


By now it is abundantly clear that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers intends to stick New Orleans with the fatally flawed floodwalls the Corps designed and built along the city's three outfall canals — at London Avenue, Orleans Avenue and 17th Street. No New Orleanian who lived through Hurricane Katrina will ever forget that the London Avenue and 17th Street canals catastrophically failed during the storm, playing a part in flooding tens of thousands of homes and killing more than 1,000 people. We also know that, in the wake of the storm, the defective floodwalls have not been fully repaired but merely patched where they failed. That is unacceptable.

  Col. Robert Sinkler, commander of the Hurricane Protection Office, made the Corps' position known at a recent meeting with the New Orleans City Council's recovery committee. Sinkler told council members that because of the interim gates near the mouths of the outfall canals, the interior floodwalls are no longer part of the federal flood control system — and the feds therefore are no longer responsible for them. To make sure we understood Sinkler's comment, Gambit asked the Corps for clarification. We were told via email that operation and maintenance of the outfall canal floodwalls are the responsibility of the nonfederal sponsor, which means the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East. That's news to Tim Doody, president of SLFPA-East's board of commissioners. "Those walls have not been decommissioned," Doody says. "They are still part of the federal system."

  During the same council meeting, Sinkler added that Corps civil works projects are "typically" turned over to locals for operation and maintenance upon completion. Sinkler has commanded the hurricane office only since May, so perhaps he doesn't understand there's nothing "typical" about those canal floodwalls other than their defective design and construction. New Orleanians should not have to take ownership of an inferior federal product.

  It has been suggested that the Corps will make $90 million in repairs to rehabilitate and refurbish the floodwalls, which will somehow prevent future breaches. Baloney. It doesn't take an engineering degree to recognize that when you put the equivalent of Band-Aids on floodwalls that ruptured in multiple places, there is no way to guarantee those floodwalls, some of which still have the substandard "I-wall" design, will ever be made foolproof.

  The safest approach is to start from scratch, and in this case, that means adopting the plan known locally as "Option 2A," which includes permanent pump stations at the end of the three outfall canals. This plan also would remove the floodwalls and levees along the outflow canals and then deepen and pave the channels, allowing water to use gravity to flow to the lakefront. Some older New Orleans Sewerage and Water Board interior pump stations no longer would be needed; the permanent lakefront pumps would become all-purpose, year-round pumping stations. Additionally, the plan would add a pumping station in Old Metairie to send water directly to the Mississippi River.

  Unfortunately, in September, a U.S. House and Senate conference committee rejected an amendment co-sponsored by Sens. Mary Landrieu and David Vitter that would have directed the Corps to conduct a peer-review study with cost estimates for this and other options. Landrieu blamed the Corps for lobbying against the study, and she vowed to amend other bills to incorporate it.

  We support Landrieu's idea of modifying another bill to include the study, but we also think it's time for the Louisiana delegation to beat the Corps at its own game. The Corps loves to say it can only do what Congress authorizes, a posture that allows the Corps to claim it doesn't have the authority to build Option 2A. If that's the case, then our delegation should work with other members of Congress to direct the Corps to take full responsibility for the floodwalls it builds — as part of the region's federal flood protection plan — and to take all possible steps to prevent future breaches, including a full study of Option 2A. There must be no doubt that the feds are responsible for the local floodwalls.

  We hope that once the Corps realizes it must build a holistic flood-control system, it will recognize the need to tear down those walls, not put $90 million worth of lipstick on them while leaving Louisianans in jeopardy, and proceed with Option 2A.



Share this article:

Del.icio.us  digg  facebook  Google Bookmarks  MySpace  Newsvine  reddit  Technorati  Yahoo My Web  ?

Tags: , ,



COMMENTS
3 comments posted for this article
New Orleans Ladder, Bywater
 12/21/2009 - 6:00pm
   Thank Y'all!
   This is what I call Stepping into the Pocket.
   I believe the Corps is setting the parish up to pay for those Bad Floodwalls by shortchanging Jeffeson parish and consequently Orleans parish flood safety funding: $340 Million
   http://www.nola.com/hurricane/index.ssf/2009/12/post_20.html
   That is a horrible but typically non-contextual nola.com pr piece btw, all the corps all the time.
   But fortunately we have Gambit watching our backs.
   Remember back this Fall, when the Corps was meeting in Metarie hotel rooms to suss out $300 Million in Cuts to flood projects? Now this is how they will defund any other Option which is in opposition to their Option.
   It is their way or the flood way.
   But they are completely incorrect and full of themselves to thing those Bad Flood Walls which they built will suddenly cease to be their responsibility and become ours alone.
   This is so important and y'all are right on top of it!
   Let's have MORE!!!
Report this comment
SandySays
 12/21/2009 - 10:28pm
   I was present for that City Council meeting on December 9 and I challenged Col Sinkler on his statements that the outfall canals were "out of the system." On camera, and before the Council, I politely reminded the Colonel that the outfall canals are indeed part of the Hurricane Protection System via the Energy and Appropriations Act of 1992. And unless the law has changed, the outfall canals are still part of the federal flood protection, even if, as flood protection, they are "inferior," I said.
   
   Levees.org agrees with Gambit that "...New Orleanians should not have to take ownership of an inferior federal product...."
   
   And the Corps which enjoys plenty of popularity on Capital Hill should march back there and request funding for Option 2.
   
   Sandy Rosenthal, wife, mother, New Orleans resident and founder of Levees.org
Report this comment
MelissaLeeSmith
 12/22/2009 - 3:43pm
   Gambit receives Levees.org "seal of approval" for resisting Katrina shorthand, for not saying simply that "Katrina" flooded New Orleans.
   
   Saying Katrina flooded New Orleans is like saying traffic broke the I-35 bridge in Minneapolis.
   Both Katrina and the traffic revealed structural flaws. Both exposed blatant civil engineering mistakes.
   And in metro New Orleans, those civil engineering mistakes were federal and were made by our Army Corps of Engineers.
   
   Melissa Smith, Levees.org
Report this comment

Post a comment



My Profile | My Settings
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join our mailing list
Stay up to date on the latest New Orleans news and entertainment via email.


advertisements

Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2010, Gambit   RSS